Scribe Notes:

            Ken: A lot of the research I am finding pertains to the broad spectrum of my thesis, it is not very narrow or clear. For the most part, the evidence is very clear and precise.

Miranda: Going onto google, the articles are more opinionated than the scholarly articles. The scholarly articles provide statistics, in depth evidence and more supporting details about the topic.

Joshua: The journals have more accurate validation than the five W’s. Most the evidence after a few years has been outdated.

Negatives: The research process has been a little frustrating for the most part due to inaccurate findings from google, or other opinionated sites. Most of the evidence we find through Academic Research Premier, the scholarly articles are hard to read and identify evidence because of the amount of detail put into these articles or journals. It’s hard to trace sources and back date.

Positives: Were still in the process of getting started, so most of our findings are hard to depict because of the scholarly language being used. But we view these challenges as a positive. There is a lot of great evidence/findings that are very detailed and broad which allows the reader to ask more in depth questions that could lead to a great thesis.